This is a quick post, but in regards to this piece and blog follow-ups (here, here, here), I’ve been sitting on these numbers for a while, so I figured I may as well just publish them for the edification of the Internet.

Here are the fourteen CPS neighborhood elementary schools I identified as being in the process of major gentrification, with each school’s change in the percentage of low-income students and change in the percentage of students exceeding ISAT standards in 2010 and 2013.

  1. Lincoln
    • % Low Income
      • 2010: 15.2
      • 2013: 13.2
    • % Exceed
      • 2010: 47.4
      • 2013: 56
  2. Burley
    • % Low Income
      • 2010: 28.9
      • 2013: 19.9
    • % Exceed
      • 2010: 33.3
      • 2013: 41.2
  3. Blaine
    • % Low Income
      • 2010: 24.7
      • 2013: 17.1
    • % Exceed
      • 2010: 32
      • 2013: 39.7
  4. Alcott
    • % Low Income
      • 2010: 27.4
      • 2013: 17.8
    • % Exceed
      • 2010: 24.8
      • 2013: 31.2
  5. Audubon
    • % Low Income
      • 2010: 40.4
      • 2013: 29.4
    • % Exceed
      • 2010: 17.3
      • 2013: 26.4
  6. Ogden
    • % Low Income
      • 2010: 27
      • 2013: 21.3
    • % Exceed
      • 2010: 23.9
      • 2013: 26.1
  7. Nettelhorst
    • % Low Income
      • 2010: 30.9
      • 2013: 28.3
    • % Exceed
      • 2010: 17.2
      • 2013: 25.1
  8. Agassiz
    • % Low Income
      • 2010: 56.2
      • 2013: 46.8
    • % Exceed
      • 2010: 8.6
      • 2013: 24
  9. Columbus
    • % Low Income
      • 2010: 88.9
      • 2013: 77.2
    • % Exceed
      • 2010: 14.1
      • 2013: 20.2
  10. Waters
    • % Low Income
      • 2010: 65.7
      • 2013: 48.2
    • % Exceed
      • 2010: 11.7
      • 2013: 19.6
  11. Prescott
    • % Low Income
      • 2010: 81.2
      • 2013: 60.4
    • % Exceed
      • 2010: 3.9
      • 2013: 17.8
  12. Hamilton
    • % Low Income
      • 2010: 62.6
      • 2013: 39.1
    • % Exceed
      • 2010: 7.4
      • 2013: 17.6
  13. Ravenswood
    • % Low Income
      • 2010: 65.5
      • 2013: 55.2
    • % Exceed
      • 2010: 7.5
      • 2013: 13.1
  14. Burr
    • % Low Income
      • 2010: 66.6
      • 2013: 52.3
    • % Exceed
      • 2010: 5.8
      • 2013: 10.7